Many strange things happened to me today, but in the interests of avoiding offending people and invading privacy and all that, I shall focus on a singular, fairly small thing that irritated me today.
Today, I met a friend of mine, with whom I haven't spoken to for a little while. Now, as glad as I am to speak to anybody who falls under that category, she said something which I found rather offensive. She said there were certain qualifying criteria to be her friend. These are no smoking, no excessive drinking and no flirting. Now, whether or not I personally meet these criteria or not are of no concern to me. It is the very concept of having to qualify for anything in order to retain, maintain or strike up any sort of relationship. I am what I am, and that is something that will not change for anything or anyone.
Ok, that's not entirely accurate. It is completely possible that I may choose to change something about myself if I deem fit. For me to deem it fit, I must choose between that particular aspect of who I am, and the importance of the reason for me changing. For example, if I had a kid, and I thought that any alcohol at all would be harmful to the kid, whether as an example or as an influence on my behaviour, I would cut out all alcoholic consumption. But if I were being judged on my fitness to be a parent, then I do not think that anything of the sort should even be a factor. If it is, then whoever is doing the judging should just buzz off. Everything I do or I am is part of me. The whole. To judge any one aspect of the whole is to judge the entire. If a person should choose to cut off some sort of relationship because I smoke, for example, or I drink sometimes, then I have my sincere doubts as to the value of such a relationship in the first place.
Now, this is not to say that I am perfect, or that there is nothing about myself that I should change. On the contrary, there is a lot that I think I should change about myself. But these changes should occur because I think them necessary or desirable, not because somebody else thinks that I am not acceptable. It is quite a major offense to my sense of self and pride to suggest that I should be something that I am not, though it be a minor alteration, simply because somebody else thinks so. No, that is not acceptable.
I am generally amenable to advice. I may not always follow it, but I am usually willing to listen at least. To claim that I am stubborn would not be inaccurate, but I will listen. To try and enforce a change upon me is asking a bit much. To threaten in order to push a change through is just anathema.
I am who I am. If you want to accept me, then you shall have to accept me whole. No suggestions of tolerance, for if there is something to tolerate, then there is no acceptance. I do not say that no tolerance is necessary, but it is tolerance of the byproducts, of the external representations of myself. Of my self, my habits, the way I think, the way I act, there can be no talk of tolerance. That would be an insult. Perhaps not an insult, per se, but certainly this person could not be my friend.
I know I am flawed. In many ways. I do not deny this. But that is me. To want only parts of me, but not the rest, well, that is impossible. Every part of me is integral. Even the smallest things. The little habits. The way I regulate my breathing sometimes for no real reason. The way I click my teeth occasionally. The way I crack my index knuckles compulsively. The way I wave my fingers before my keyboard at times as if I am threatening the keys. Every little thing is part of me, and cannot be changed if I am to retain this particular sense of me. I will change many of these things, and I will no longer be the same me as before. These changes will come out of my own will, because I choose to. Not because I feel compelled to.
Oh, and on a side note, I watched The Terminal a couple days back. Might as well name it Castaway II. The original is better.